note on the manuscript tradition of Ockham"s tractalus "De quantitate".
Read Online

note on the manuscript tradition of Ockham"s tractalus "De quantitate".

  • 891 Want to read
  • ·
  • 66 Currently reading

Published .
Written in English


  • William, -- of Ockham, -- ca.1285-ca.1349.

Book details:

Edition Notes

Offprint from: Archivum Franciscanumhistoricum (Florence), 57, 1964.

ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL19618894M

Download note on the manuscript tradition of Ockham"s tractalus "De quantitate".


Furthermore, the book is suitable for a graduate seminar on Ockham’s razor and individual chapters can be used for specialist graduate courses in the philosophy of probability, the philosophy of biology and the philosophy of mind.’ Bengt Autzen Source: Philosophy of ScienceCited by: Jun 16,  · The Tractatus must be read in accordance with the numbering system, and that demands that the reader follow the text after the manner of a logical tree, which is the way in which the book was composed and in which Wittgenstein arranged (selected and supplemented) the best of the philosophical remarks that he had been writing since 1 The Cited by: Ockham summa logicae pdf 1 That is, Adam Wodeham, a contemporary of Ockham and possibly for a while. 12 One manuscript of the Summa logicae describes Ockhams Preface Guillelmi de Ockham, Summa logicae, Philotheus Boehner, Gedeon Gál and Stephanus Brown. Buy The #Tractatus De Herbis', British Library, MS. Egerton and the illustrative traditions of early manuscripts herbals by Minta Hazel Lynne Collins (ISBN:) from Amazon's Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible Minta Hazel Lynne Collins.

The best manuscripts identify the author as `Remi Favini' (in the genitive); included in early printed editions of Priscian, [Venice] (Goff P), &c., and independently pr. [Leipzig ] (ISTC), the writer's name had become Rhemnius Fannius, identified in the early 16th cent. with the 1st-cent. quantitate continua and Tractatus II - De quantitate discr eta; these topics are treated also in several other parts of the book. In Placita Philosophica one chapter deals with Quantitas andAuthor: Michele Sbacchi. History. The phrase Occam's razor did not appear until a few centuries after William of Ockham's death in Libert Froidmont, in his On Christian Philosophy of the Soul, takes credit for the phrase, speaking of "novacula occami". Ockham did not invent this principle, but the "razor"—and its association with him—may be due to the frequency and effectiveness with which he used it. centro de estudos de filosofia patrística e medieval de são paulo. projeto ariadne. guilherme de ockham. Esta bibliografia lista o acervo de bibliotecas de São Paulo, inclui referências complementares a outras bibliotecas e, quando é o caso, remete ao acervo pessoal de membros do CEPAME.

A Tract of Great Price: A Manuscript of Alchemy [Unknown Author, Tarl Warwick] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Originally entitled The True Teaching of Philosophy Concerning the Generation of Metals and their True Origin5/5(1). OCKHAM, WILLIAM OF (, near London, England, ca. ; d. Munich, Germany, ) philosophy, theology, political theory. Traditionally regarded as the initiator of the movement called nominalism, which dominated the universities of northern Europe in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries and played a significant role in shaping the directions of modern thought, William of Ockham ranks. William of Ockham (/ ˈ ɒ k əm /; also Occam, from Latin: Gulielmus Occamus; c. – ) was an English Franciscan friar, scholastic philosopher, and theologian, who is believed to have been born in Ockham, a small village in Surrey. He is considered to be one of the major figures of medieval thought and was at the centre of the major intellectual and political controversies of the Alma mater: University of Oxford. Oct 06,  · Master Nicholas of Amsterdam (Germany, first half of the fifteenth century) composed various commentaries on Aristotle’s works. One of these commentaries is on the logica vetus, the old logic, viz. on Porphyry’s Isagoge and on Aristotle’s Categories and On Interpretation. This commentary is edited and introduced